Bottom line: This English page is the counterpart of the Chinese briefing 无源灭火与有源灭火技术对比. It summarizes the same protection logic for international readers; design values must be confirmed on site.
Source abstract (ZH): 无源灭火与有源灭火技术对比 | 智立安 CHILION NEWS CENTER 无源灭火与有源灭火技术对比 产品动态、行业应用案例与技术进展 发布日期：2026-08-20 在电气消防领域，"无源"与"有源"是两条并行的技术路线，各自有清晰的适用边界和技术逻辑。简单来说， 有源灭火靠电信号驱动，无源灭火靠物理量触发 。两者不是简单的替代关系，而是在不同空间尺…
CHILION provides PFCS polymer fire-control materials, EAPD active protection devices, and the ICOP operations platform for electrical fire risk reduction.
It explains actionable electrical active-protection points for selection and deployment. Figures are based on standard test conditions and do not replace on-site design or fire-safety assessment.
Start from the protected asset, available space, and whether power/wiring is allowed; then match a passive patch, active device, or platform workflow.
Call 400-8558-313 or use the Contact page with site conditions; our team replies during business hours.